In the corporate sphere , there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that call an organization’s ethical standards into question. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia formerly operating under the name Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of unethical behavior that tarnishes personal and corporate reputations but throws doubt over the enterprise’s ethical framework .


Even in light of the disturbing allegations , Collins has remained in his managerial role, apparently unimpacted by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been allowed to persist? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to testimonies from colleagues, Collins’ track record of misconduct started with violations of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it didn’t cease there . Instead, it evolved into repeated infractions that has left the workforce disheartened and partners bewildered .


Amid a executive coaching event — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly turned an opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he engaged in unprofessional conduct while on company-sponsored travel, accessed inappropriate content , a clear breach of Ventia’s corporate guidelines, all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches didn’t cease at those affairs . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women —a gross breach of trust and confidentiality. His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these virtual misconduct, Collins allegedly took his actions to a new level: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite his being married and her a post having a committed relationship . This flagrant misuse of work hours and corporate assets broke all norms of professionalism but also had ramifications beyond just the corporate sphere.

How has this level of misconduct remained unchecked? What allows someone accused of repeated ethical breaches to remain in leadership? The explanation, it appears, stems from a culture of impunity in leadership . Despite reports, no action has been taken against him.

This lack of oversight sends an alarming message: that certain employees remain untouchable despite egregious violations. It fosters a toxic corporate culture , discourages ethical behavior , and here ultimately undermines corporate credibility.